The idea he attacked most eloquently was the idea of Diminishing Marginal Productivity. He argued that some ideas in principal courses are obselete.
Is Diminishing Marginal Productivity an old obselete idea?
I was a little intoxicated but his argument in a nutshell was Microeconomics as taught in Principal courses is just mental gymnastics, but he also argued that there is a value in having students practicing a bit of logic.
Some of the ideas that we agreed were accurately portrayed in Micro were:
- Cost Benefit analysis
- Incentives
- Game Theory
No comments:
Post a Comment